Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Sainvil v. Satz et al
as 0:2018cv60592
Plaintiff:
Junio Sainvil
Defendant:
Michael J. Satz, Broward Sheriff Office, Dennis D. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Vila v. Derrick Cunningham, et al
as 17-13244
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY CURTIS VILA
Respondent - Appellee:
DERRICK CUNNINGHAM, the Sheriff of Montgomery County, Alabama, DARYL D. BAILEY, the District Attorney for the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Alabama, STEVE WADLINGTON, the District Attorney for Conecuh County, Alabama and others
Bailey v. Lee
as 3:2017cv00512
Petitioner:
Erick D. Bailey
Respondent:
Randy Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vila v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Curtis Vila
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham, Daryl D. Bailey, Steve Wadlington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bailey v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv00095
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Larry D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey (ID 0114543) v. Shawnee County Jail et al
as 5:2016cv03201
Plaintiff:
Jocco D. Bailey
Defendant:
Shawnee County Jail, (fnu) Andrews, Joe Rucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. USA
as 5:2015cv02386
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jermaine D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cohea v. Melo
as 1:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M Melo, Thelton E Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv08275
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Bailey
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Jail and Svc List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohea v. Melo
as 4:2014cv04288
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M. Melo, Thelton E. Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
