Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hilliard v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05039
Plaintiff:
Latitia D. Hilliard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Hilliard v. Illinois Department of Corr et al
as 3:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Hilliard
Defendant:
James Luth and John Does #1 and #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilliard et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Hilliard and Denzel L. Harris
Defendant:
S. A. Godinez and James Luth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Grimage v. G. Espino, et al
as 14-12999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE GRIMAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
G. A. ESPINO, Doctor Chief Health Officer, D. HILLIARD, Correctional Officer, BRAD WHITEHEAD and others
Jon Misewicz, et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee
as 14-5053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON MISEWICZ, MICHAEL ALBERSON, JR., MARTINAS ANDREWS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
Jon Misewicz, et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee
as 14-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALBERSON, JR., MARTINAS ANDREWS, MYRON D. APPLEWHITE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
Hilliard v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv07815
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Hilliard
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Robert Lyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimage v. Whitehead et al
as 3:2013cv00935
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Grimage, B. Whitehead, D Hilliard and others
Defendant:
G. A. Espino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIMAGE v. WHITEHEAD et al
as 1:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EUGENE GRIMAGE
Defendant:
B WHITEHEAD, D HILLIARD, TOLLICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilliard v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00393
Petitioner:
Nicole D Hilliard
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
