Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Amanda et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03575
Plaintiff:
McClure-Ignacio Amanda, Alan Mosinak, Andrew Willoughby and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00083
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Angie Cowan Hamada v. Laborforce, LLC, et al
as 25-3110
Plaintiff:
ANGIE COWAN HAMADA, Regional Director of Region 13 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
LABORFORCE, LLC, M&K TRUCK CENTERS and M&K EMPLOYEE SERVICES, INC.
Morrell v. Hamada of Japan Corporation et al
as 1:2025cv09948
Plaintiff:
Rene Morrell
Defendant:
Hamada of Japan Corporation and Baoguo Jiang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hamada v. Kansas City Life Insurance Company
as 0:2025cv61676
Plaintiff:
Jim Hamada
Defendant:
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hamada v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04795
Defendant:
3M Company, DowDuPont Inc., Dynax Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
John Hamada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hamada v. 3M Company et al
as SC/2:24-cv-04795
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hamada
Protective Life Insurance Company v. Makarita
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Protective Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hamada Makarita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Cowan Hamada
as 1:2023cv15404
Plaintiff:
Regional Director Angie Cowan Hamada
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
