Cases 1 - 10 of 883
(PC) Green v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Jarvon D. Green
Defendant:
D. Jackson, Gomez and R. Empleo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03674
Plaintiff:
Dmitri D. Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, D. Griffin and G. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
DAVIS, BRICE GOOGLE, D WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Darnell D Jackson
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Jason Smiley, Adam Leidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Perry et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Trevelis D. Jackson
Defendant:
Counselor Perry, Correctional Officer Guyton, Sgt. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Katrina D. Jackson
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc. and Andy Frain Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16927
Plaintiff:
Kelsey D Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Boutay, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS D JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN BOBBITT, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES, OFFICER MARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Jackson v. USA
as 23-5986
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franklin v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Bryce Franklin
Defendant:
D. Jackson, Mathew Montoya, Timothy Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
