Cases 31 - 40 of 830
EDENFIELD v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F EDENFIELD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF CRIMINAL CONFLICT AND CIVIL REGIONAL COUNSEL, SCOTT D MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06996
Plaintiff:
ERIC D MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Miller v. Gladieux
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jimmie D Miller
Defendant:
David J Gladieux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Slotkin, et al v. Elissa MillerIn re: Mark Slotkin, et al v. Elissa Miller
as 23-55098
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MARK ABBEY SLOTKIN
Appellant:
SLOTKIN DEFECTIVE TRUST OF DECEMBER 14, 2012, SLOTKIN DEFECTIVE TRUST OF APRIL 12, 2010, INTENTIONALLY DEFECTIVE SLOTKIN FAMILY CHILDRENS TRUST DATED JANUARY 1, 1997 and others
Appellee:
ELISSA D. MILLER, Trustee
Miller v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jason D Miller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Paul Beaton v. Valley State Prison, et al
as 23-15112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL NIVARD BEATON
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY STATE PRISON, D. MILLER and J. VALENZUELA-QUEZADA
Miller v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Markey Walker v. Jones, et al
as 23-1022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARKEY LAMONT WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT JONES, DEPUTY WARDEN KLUDY and D. MILLER, Assistant Deputy Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
