Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rutledge v. Ampex Brands of Bartlett, LLC
as 1:2024cv03836
Plaintiff:
Kameika D Rutledge
Defendant:
Ampex Brands of Bartlett LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 6:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lake v. Bustamonte et al
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Darius De'mon Lake
Defendant:
A Bustamonte, D. Rutledge and A. Oboyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lake v. Oboyle et al
as 2:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
Darius De'mon Lake
Defendant:
A. Oboyle and D. Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best Carpet Values, Inc., et al v. Google LLC
as 22-15899
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BEST CARPET VALUES, INC. and THOMAS D. RUTLEDGE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC
Best Carpet Values, Inc., et al v. Google LLC
as 22-80042
Respondent:
BEST CARPET VALUES, INC. and THOMAS D. RUTLEDGE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
GOOGLE LLC
Best Carpet Values, Inc. et al v. Google LLC
as 5:2020cv04700
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Rutledge and Best Carpet Values, Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Blackman v. Benyard, et al.
as 3:2019cv02221
Defendant:
V Cortes, D Rutledge, E Benyard and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
