Cases 11 - 20 of 27
BYNUM v. GORSKY et al
as 3:2019cv18874
Defendant:
TARA GLASGOW, MICHAEL E SNEED, RONALD A. WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nusbaum v. Adamczyk et al
as 1:2019cv00898
Nominal Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas A. Szlosek, Clive R. Hollick, Grace D. Lieblein and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Nusbaum
HIRSCHFELD v. BECKERLE et al
as 3:2018cv14796
Defendant:
CHARLES PRINCE, ANNE M MULCAHY, WILLIAM D PEREZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARC HIRSCHFELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIRSCHFELD v. BECKERLE et al
as 3:2018cv14796
Defendant:
CHARLES PRINCE, ANNE M MULCAHY, WILLIAM D PEREZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARC HIRSCHFELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jiggetts v. United Parcel Service
as 18-721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Jiggetts
Defendant - Appellee:
United Parcel Service, John Mannion, Security Manager, CEO Luz Adelis and others
Defendant:
Former CEO D. Scott Davis, Moanne Sukier and David Abney, Current CEO
Davis v. Shawback et al
as 9:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
D. Scott Davis
Defendant:
Logan Shawback , Mark Mulcahy , Flathead County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Zugabie et al
as 7:2015cv09093
Plaintiff:
Shmuel Klein
Defendant:
Thomas P. Zugabie, United Parcel Service, Inc. , David P. Abney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Day v. UPS, et al
as 15-11176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DAY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., D. SCOTT DAVIS, DAVID P. ABNEY and others
Jiggetts v. United Parcel Service et al
as 1:2014cv08291
Plaintiff:
James Jiggetts
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, D. Scott Davis and Davis Abney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Day v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02433
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Day
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., D. Scott Davis, David P. Abney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
