Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cole v. Ber- Berlin FCI et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jim Scott Cole
Defendant:
Ber- Berlin FCI, Team Quebec, N. Cairns- U/M and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alva v. Lew Lewisburg USP et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James Scott Alva
Defendant:
Lew Lewisburg USP, Ber Berlin FCI, N Cairns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Curtis Shuler v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 20-7228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant / Appellee:
R. JOHNSON, KENNETH BEAVER, DENNIS SELZER and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDENFIELD et al
as 5:2015cv00266
Defendant:
GREGORY EDENFIELD, HILDA EDENFIELD, GREGORY NICHOLAS EDENFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Curtis Shuler v. D. Mitchell
as 15-6842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
D. MITCHELL, R. HARRIS and L. DIAMOND
Curtis Shuler v. W. Hargrave
as 13-7957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
W. T. HARGRAVE and J. ATWATER
Curtis Shuler v. Lawrence Parson
as 12-8142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE PARSONS and J. ATWATER, Mailroom Supervisor
Curtis Shuler v. Richard Neely
as 11-6592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD NEELY, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution, C. W. CLARK, Supervisor, Food Management, Lanesboro Correctional Institution and J. BENNETT, Supervisor, Programs, Lanesboro Correctional Institution
Curtis Shuler v. Richard Neely
as 10-6874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD NEELY, Superintendent of Lanesboro Correctional Institution, J. BENNETT, Superintendent of Lanesboro Correctional Institution, J. ATWATER, Mailroom Supervisor, Lanesboro Correctional Institution and others
Curtis Shuler v. John Vaughn
as 10-6228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN N. VAUGHN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
