Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Smith v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv02370
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Hill v. Smith
as 3:2026cv02426
Petitioner:
Tyrice Hill
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King, Jr. v. TDCJ-ID Jim Ferguson Unit Staff et al
as 4:2026cv07890
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID Jim Ferguson Unit Staff, Romeo C. Nana, Treshay S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray Jr. v. Keith Stone and Surety Bonds et al
as 5:2026ct03284
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Murray Jr.
Defendant:
Keith Stone and Surety Bonds, Captain Costa and His Employees, Lead Nurse in Charge of Medication and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smelley v. Smith
as 2:2026cv01681
Petitioner:
Lionel Matazie Smelley
Respondent:
Vencini Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ballard v. Waddell et al
as 5:2026ct03283
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Defendant:
Warden Waddell, Nurse Rogers, Nurse Cenbron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES INC
as 3:2026cv05004
Plaintiff:
TONY SMITH
Defendant:
PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES, INC. doing business as BOB TYLER TOYOTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Upshaw v. Wilson, et al
as 6:2026cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ucasha Upshaw, Sr.
Defendant:
Physician Assistant Wilson and Eugene Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
