Cases 1 - 10 of 931
BLUE v. ELKINS et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL ELKINS, MIAIAH J. POTWYN, MARK D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Collins v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Collins
Defendant:
D. Smith and David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William Chiles v. Domanick Smith
as 24-6354
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CHILES
Defendant:
DOMANICK D. SMITH, Assistant Unit Manager, CROMER HAIGLER, MACEO WILKINS and others
(PC) Duclos v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
D. Smith, J. Servin, S. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kim Florence v. District Attorney of Columbus, et al
as 24-11037
Plaintiff:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COLUMBUS, MAYOR OF COLUMBUS, SHERIFF OF COLUMBUS and others
Smith, Jr. II v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Smith, Jr. II
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLAZO v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv22777
Plaintiff:
ISHAWN A. COLLAZO
Defendant:
D. SMITH, MR. PATTERSON and SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Parker v. Stephen Meiko, et al
as 23-2044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN MEIKO, in his individual capacity as a Registered Nurse for Michigan Department of Corrections, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, in her individual capacity as Warden of Alger Correctional Facility, DOUG TASSON, in his individual capacity as Deputy Warden for Alger Correctional Facility and others
Harrison v. Smith et al
as 0:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Fairrel D. Smith, John D. Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
