Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Welch v. Sproul
as 3:2019cv01344
Petitioner:
Eric D. Welch
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holger v. Burgess et al
as 3:2018cv00287
Defendant:
Karen D. Morrison, Carla R. Erickson, Debora M. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger
Holger et al v. Burgess et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Defendant:
State of Alaska Inc., Shawn Rice, Families Matter LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger and Michael Anthony Ogle
Eklund v. USA et al
as 6:2018cv03355
Defendant:
Federal Reserve System, Rich Curtner, Mike Pompeo and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger Eklund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holger v. United States of America Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00241
Defendant:
Gary George Colbath, Rich Curtner, American British Accredited Registry Association Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Sproul et al
as 3:2017cv05727
Petitioner:
William G Moore
Respondent:
D Sproul and Charles Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gordon v. Berkebile, et al
as 14-1197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHEOUS L. GORDON, AKA Orville Owen
Defendant - Appellee:
D. BERKEBILE, Warden, K. FLUCK, Case manager, W. HAYGOOD, Counselor and others
Rodriguez v. Daniels, et al
as 11-1170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSIEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANIELS, Warden, USP Florence, "John Doe #1," Special Investigations Agent, USP Florence, "John Doe #2," Special Investigations Specialist, USP Florence, L.J. MILUSNIC, Assistant Warden, ADX Florence and D. SPROUL, Step-Down Program Unit Manager, ADX Florence
Deberry v. Davis, et al
as 11-1152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK D. DEBERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE R. DAVIS, J. FOX and D. SPROUL
Rodriguez v. Daniels et al
as 1:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Osiel Rodriguez
Defendant:
C. Daniels, L. J. Milusnic and D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
