Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Williams v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Williams
Defendant:
John Doe Schwartz, Lieutenant R. Keen, Lieutenant John Doe Frisk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
IN RE: JONATHAN D. WILLIAMS
as 2:2023cv03941
In Re:
JONATHAN D WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-Redding v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
Edda D. Williams-Redding
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATERMAN v. DOMTAR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv03164
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
DOMTAR CORPORATION, ROBERT E APPLE, GIANNELLA ALVAREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Williams v. May et al
as 1:2021cv00819
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Petitioner:
John D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. GLASSBORO POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2021cv09357
Defendant:
CPL. JULIE HOWERY and GLASSBORO POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff:
GARY D WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
