Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Boler v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
Travis Boler
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., State of Mississippi and Warden Franklin D. Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latimer et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. et al
as 1:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
Penny L. Latimer and Jennifer L. Utton
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, John and Jane Does A,B,C, and D, State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flowers v. Turner et al
as 1:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Marcus Flowers
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, D. Brewer and Brenda Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Accident Insurance Company v. Classic Building Design, L.L.C, et al
as 12-60886
Defendant-Cross Defendant - Appellee:
CLASSIC BUILDING DESIGN, L.L.C.
Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTHA PACE
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT D. BREWER
Brewer v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2011cv01569
Plaintiff:
Marilyn D Brewer
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Travis Livingston v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 11-60543
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRAVIS LIVINGSTON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and FRANKLIN D BREWER
Summers v. Livingston et al
as 1:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, John M Moriarty, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy v. Epps et al
as 1:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Gaddy
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Franklin D. Brewer and J. Bunch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatten v. Lafargue et al
as 2:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
Carl Lafargue, J P Young, J Michieli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Gaddy v. Franklin Brewer
as 10-60739
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE GADDY
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANKLIN D BREWER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
