Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Clark
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Anderson et al v. Grande et al
as 5:2022ct03405
Plaintiff:
Lamate Sherron Anderson and Every Inmate of State of North Carolina
Defendant:
Kimberly D. Grande, D. Clark, Officer Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Clark
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Lee et al v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03307
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Galvin, Isaam Chaplin and Dominique Lee
Defendant:
John Doe 1-2, Erik A. Hooks, D. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Sapper et al
as 5:2020ct03281
Plaintiff:
William Kimble
Defendant:
P. White, D. Clark, J. Sapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. 3M Company
as 5:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bruce D Clark
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Approximately $60,424.52 et al
as 3:2015cv00450
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $60,424.52, Approximately $6,986.68, Approximately $282,416.11 and others
Claimant:
Berkeley-Hughes & Associates, LLC and Cedric D Clark
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
Cox v. Henning et al
as 5:2015ct03127
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cornilius Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Henning, D. Clark, C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Clark et al
as 5:2011ct03209
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Griffith
Defendant:
D. Clark, Whidpee, Castello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
