Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Davis v. Godert
as 4:2021cv00630
Petitioner: Larneal D. Davis
Respondent: Superintendent Chantay Godert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Griffith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv08000
Petitioner: Richard D. Davis
Respondent: Cindy Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2015cv00742
Plaintiff: Angel D. Davis , L. G. D. , W. J. B. and others
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01314
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv01240
Respondent: USA
Movant: Charles D Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00087
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv04011
Plaintiff: Kenneth D. Davis
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAVIS v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 4:2011cv01643
Plaintiff: DACIA D. DAVIS
Defendant: Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. City of Dearborn, Michigan et al
as 4:2009cv00576
Plaintiff: Yancy D. Davis
Defendant: City of Dearborn, Michigan, Dearborn Police Department, Dennis David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?