Cases 31 - 40 of 216
J.T.M. et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
J.T.M., Children's Legal Center, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated and Children's Legal Center
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shane Johnson v. Matthew Marske
as 22-1048
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHANE D. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW MARSKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wasia Maya v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-3337
Petitioner:
WASIA K. MAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of ICE, HENRY LUCERO, ICE Chicago Field Office Director and others
JOHNSON v. KARDIS et al
as 1:2021cv03021
Plaintiff:
RANDOLL D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
EMILY KARDIS and CHRISTINA LIEDTKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shane Johnson v. William M. Conley
as 21-3273
Petitioner:
SHANE D. JOHNSON
Respondent:
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
Johnson v. Malprass et al
as 1:2021cv06435
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
David Malprass, American Med Association, Queen Elizabeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Williams v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00914
Plaintiff:
Sulton B Williams, Sr and Sulton B H Williams, Sr
Defendant:
D Johnson, Crawford and Marshall County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
