Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Trahan et al v. Richardson et al
as 6:2017cv00013
Defendant:
Tyshawn D Richardson , Sagamore Insurance Co , Allstate Insurance Co and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Trahan and Roland Trahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. L. Richardson
as 16-11132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
L. D. RICHARDSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Streets v. Buster Cole State Jail
as 4:2014cv00577
Plaintiff:
John L Streets
Defendant:
Buster Cole State Jail, Ashley T Torres and Clayton D Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02223
Plaintiff:
Tonta R. Polk , Ervin Charles Pough , Marcus L. Pough and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Rice et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00845
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Rice , James T. Braddock , Brian A. Buie and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-50825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00447
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
