Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Barton v. Real Innovation Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05194
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Real Innovation Inc, Richardson Marketing Group LLC, Deryck D Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Steven James Gomez Jr. v. D. Richardson
as 2:2023cv07971
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez Jr. and Steven James Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
D. Richardson, Judge Jennifer Neal-Jones, Christopher Kehell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PC) Adkins v. Schultz et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
DuPree Lamont Adkins
Defendant:
J. Schultz, D. Richardson, B. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guevara v. Bernson et al
as 3:2022cv08919
Petitioner:
Michael Guevara
Defendant:
Bernson and D. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guevara v. Richardson
as 5:2022cv04759
Plaintiff:
Michael Guevara
Defendant:
D. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. San Diego Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2020cv02435
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Richardson
Defendant:
Crew Shift, Officer H., George Bailey Detention and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Love v. Kirkland et al
as 2:2019cv02540
Defendant:
A. Torres, B. Jensen, H. Kirkland and others
Plaintiff:
Candice Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richardson v. Allen et al
as 3:2017cv00526
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, Nurse Eddie, Hahn and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
