Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Johansen et al v. Myers et al
as 1:2023cv00006
Counter Defendant:
Lance Johansen and Mississippi Orthopedic Institute, PLLC
Defendant:
Phillip Myers, Paula Smith, John D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Smith v. Green et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D. Smith
Defendant:
Kim Green and Unknown Henderson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry v. Maint. Training Corp. et al
as 3:2021cv00655
Plaintiff:
Adrian Larry
Defendant:
Maint. Training Corp., Personnel Employed at said fac., East Miss Correc. Fac. and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Pike County Circuit Court et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Fred Gordon, D. Smith, Clerk Roger Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Three R's, LLC
as 3:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Three R's, LLC and McDonald
Plaintiff:
Jamie D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Martin
as 1:2019cv00368
Defendant:
Lucy Martin
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv00541
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Brown
Defendant:
Sherrill D. Smith, Jerome Wilson and Coast National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnett v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Corey Barnett
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Norris Hogans, Unknown Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Winding v. Hogans et al
as 3:2014cv00677
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
N. Hogans, M.T.C., Inc., B. Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
