Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GEOSURFACES SOUTHEAST, INC. et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
GEOSURFACES SOUTHEAST, INC. and POLYLOOM CORPORATION OF AMERICA doing business as TENCATE GRASS
Defendant:
KENNETH D. SMITH and BEYNON SPORTS SURFACES, INC.
Morrison v. Smith et al
as 5:2023ct03077
Plaintiff:
Clevis M. Morrison
Defendant:
Domanick D. Smith, Raven Barnes, Officer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chiles v. Smith et al
as 5:2023ct03029
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Chiles
Defendant:
Domanick D. Smith, Sergeant Heigler, Officer Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. MILLER et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. SMITH
Defendant:
MILLER and YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON, BURLEY, J.P. SOUTHERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullard v. Coley et al
as 5:2022ct03005
Plaintiff:
William Domonic Bullard
Defendant:
R. Coley, D. Joyner, Stephen Fonville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03289
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Warden Herring, Mark Fleming, Maury Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2021ct03068
Plaintiff:
Curtis Cardwell, Jason D. Smith and Jimmy Locklear
Defendant:
Every Shift Captain, Marshall Pike, John Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALL v. FRANK et al
as 1:2020cv01053
Defendant:
TIMOTHY D. SMITH, STANTON and GARY W. FRANK
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JERMAINE WALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
