Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WATERMAN v. FIRST HORIZON CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv01669
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
FIRST HORIZON CORP., HARRY V BARTON JR., KENNETH A BURDICK and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
RASHID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05947
Defendant:
G. SHAFFER, FRANK B. WILLIAMS, C.O. SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
AMIN A. RASHID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03748
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adger et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crumpler, Antoine Jones, Eugene W. Wiggins and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Ronald Frederick, Lt. Justin Atherholt, Governor John Carney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHEATLE v. STEWART
as 1:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
AMANDA CHEATLE
Defendant:
RUSSELL D. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart, Jr. v. Hubbell et al
as 1:2013cv01363
Plaintiff:
Royal D, Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Alan S Hubbell and Dependable Auto Shippers, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GUNTHER v. DEPENDABLE AUTO SHIPPERS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03722
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R. GUNTHER
Defendant:
DEPENDABLE AUTO SHIPPERS, INC., ALAN S. HUBBELL, SCHMIDT BAKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEWART v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84744
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. STEWART
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEWART v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72714
Plaintiff:
CLYDE D. STEWART, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
