Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Simpson v. Marshall
as 5:2022cv01972
Plaintiff:
Zarayvious D Simpson
Defendant:
Marlin Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv00213
Plaintiff:
Luther Karl Ferguson
Defendant:
Troy D Simpson, Leisha Kizzee, Patricia Demerica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Class v. Lammers et al
as 4:2019cv03516
Defendant:
Stacy Lammers, Troy D Simpson and Steve Massie
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Class
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Pena v. Texas Medical Board, et al
as 16-40451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO I. PENA, M.A. M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, ROBERTA M. KALAFUT, D.O., Former President, Texas Medical Board, KEITH MILLER, Former Member, Texas Medical Board and others
Steve Morgan v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 16-20165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE ALAN MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, TROY D. SIMPSON and KOKLIA NAIK
Simpson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 4:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Simpson
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv02833
Plaintiff:
Steve Alan Morgan
Defendant:
William Stephens, Troy D Simpson and Koklia Naik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. Texas Medical Board et al
as 5:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Francisco I. Pena
Defendant:
Texas Medical Board , Roberta M. Kalafut , Keith Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rathbone, LLC v. XTO Energy, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00149
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc., Bob R Simpson, Keith A Hutton and others
Plaintiff:
Rathbone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
