Cases 41 - 50 of 519
Thomas v. Five Star Electric
as 22-2659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Caze D. Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York State Department of Human Rights and Five Star Electric Corp.
Defendant:
Department of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12015
Plaintiff:
JEPTHAH DENNIE THOMAS and JEPHTHAH D THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Sandra D. Thomas and Rodney L. Thomas
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC, Ford Motor Company and Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Thomas v. Twitter Corporate Office et al
as 1:2022cv05341
Plaintiff:
Caze D. Thomas
Defendant:
Twitter Corporate Office, National Twitter Headquarters, Billy Elish and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08136
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Thomas v. USA
as 22-3484
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES D. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Traeger v. Thomas
as 3:2022cv03070
Defendant:
Melissa Boernson, Christina Boernson, John Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Misty Traeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
James Thomas v. USA
as 22-3361
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES D. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
