Cases 11 - 20 of 37
E.B. et al v. Landry et al
as 3:2019cv00862
Plaintiff:
E. B., D. W. and T. R.
Defendant:
Jeff Landry, Doug Welborn and Hillar C. Moore, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil Max-George v. Houston Police Department, et al
as 18-20260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL MAX-GEORGE
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER C. A. MYRICK, OFFICER D. W. DUVAL and others
Max-George v. Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv02264
Plaintiff:
Cecil Max-George
Defendant:
Houston Police Department, Officer C.A. Myrick, Officer D. W. Duval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. D W M Consulting L L C
as 4:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Byron Lopez , Charles D Johnston, Stephen LaFosse, Jr and others
Defendant:
D W M Consulting L L C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez v. D W M Consulting L L C
as 6:2015cv00425
Plaintiff:
Byron Lopez , Charles D Johnston, Stephen LaFosse, Jr and others
Defendant:
D W M Consulting L L C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. David Lewi
as 14-10119
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID KEVIN LEWIS, also known as David Shane Lewis, also known as D. W.
Wetzel v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2013cv02420
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Ronny Nail, Angie Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell, Darryl Mizell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar-Limon v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2012cv03392
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Salazar-Limon
Defendant:
City of Houston , D W Ready , Chris C Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
D W Investments, LLC v. Nabors Drilling USA, LP
as 6:2012cv02891
Plaintiff:
D W Investments L L C
Defendant:
Nabors Drilling U S A L P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
