Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00756
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alvarado v. Walker et al
as 3:2016cv02514
Plaintiff:
Hector Alvarado
Defendant:
Willie D. Walker and Bay & Bay Transfer Company, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Joyce et al
as 3:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
Ebony D Walker
Defendant:
Megan Kelly Joyce, Kathy Hatton and Montgomery County Children Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
TD Bank, N.A. v. Voisard Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02554
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Voisard Manufacturing, Inc., F.W. Roberts Mfg. Co., Inc., William D. Walker and others
Cross_defendant:
Ronald L. Constein, Metals USA Carbon Flat Rolled, Inc. , F.W. Roberts Mfg. Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Walker v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
as 1:2013cv00159
Petitioner:
Gary D Walker
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv13924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
