Cases 1 - 10 of 2,112
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. District of Columbia, et al
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Gorbey, a/k/a Tsunami Khan
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, D.C. CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS, 2ND CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS and others
X Corp. v. Center for Countering Digital Hate, Inc., et al.
as 24-2643
Plaintiff:
X CORP., a Nevada corporation
Defendant:
CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE, INC., a Washington, D.C. non-profit corporation, CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE LTD., Center for Countering Digital Hate Ltd. and STICHTING EUROPEAN CLIMATE FOUNDATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MILIONE, D.C. v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04738
Plaintiff:
DONALD MILIONE, D.C.
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
DAVIS v. WASHINGTON D.C. COMMONWEALTHS et al
as 1:2024cv04758
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON D.C. COMMONWEALTHS, APPELLATE COURT TRENTON SHERIFFS, REPUBLICS IMMIGRANTS PROSECUTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liberty Insurance Corporation et al v. Diagnostic Chiropractic MI, P.C. et al
as 2:2024cv10831
Plaintiff:
Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Diagnostic Chiropractic MI, P.C., Diagnostic Chiropractic MI II, PC, Duramed MI, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
