Cases 31 - 40 of 44
FIERMAN PRODUCE EXCHANGE, INC. AND D.M. ROTHMAN CO., INC. v. GARDEN FRESH PRODUCE, INC. AND JOSEPH GUARASINO
as 2:2010mc00174
Plaintiff:
FIERMAN PRODUCE EXCHANGE, INC. AND D.M. ROTHMAN CO., INC.
Defendant:
GARDEN FRESH PRODUCE, INC. AND JOSEPH GUARASINO
J.M. et al v. WAYNE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2010cv03934
Plaintiff:
J.M. and D.M.
Defendant:
WAYNE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
v. AUMILLER et al
as 2:2010cv39145
Defendant:
ROBERT AUMILLER , A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.H. BULL AND CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JAMES v. CHAMBERLAIN
as 2:2009cv01165
Plaintiff:
RASHEED X. JAMES
Defendant:
D.M. CHAMBERLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
D.M. et al v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2009cv02646
Plaintiff:
D.M., G.M. and M.M.
Defendant:
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (e)(2) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
R.M. et al v. TOTOWA BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2009cv02566
Plaintiff:
R.M., J.P.M., J.M. and others
Defendant:
TOTOWA BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION v. D.M. AND S.M.
as 3:2009cv01359
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
D.M. AND S.M.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WARD et al v. BARILOTTI et al
as 2:2008cv04895
Plaintiff:
BRENDAN WARD, B. WARD MASONRY, INC., BRENDAN WARD MASONRY INC. and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH BARILOTTI, NICHOLAS SABIA, D.M. SABIA & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
D.M. SABIA & COMPANY,INC. v. CANDOR CONSTRUCTION GROUP,INC. et al
as 2:2008cv03646
Plaintiff:
D.M. SABIA & COMPANY,INC.
Defendant:
CANDOR CONSTRUCTION GROUP,INC. and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
