Cases 41 - 50 of 169
Richard Richards v. Pannan Day
as 17-15609
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD L. RICHARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
PANNAN DAYS, D.W. Arizona State Prison
Gaines v. Neven et al
as 3:2017cv00140
Petitioner:
Cornelius A. Gaines, III
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel v. State of Nevada ex rel. NDOC et al
as 3:2017cv00128
Defendant:
Vanessa Heidt, Patrick Moreda, Nevada, State Of and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Rangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald D.W. North v. Ubiquity, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Gerald D.W. North
Defendant:
Ubiquity, Inc.
Thomas Stewart, Jr. v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-15133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS STEWART, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, UNKNOWN LOCKHART, named as Dr. Lockhart, KAREN BARCKLAY-DODSON, named as Dr. K. Barcklay-Dodson and others
Carter v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Shannon Carter
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson, Jerry Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald D.W. North v. Ubiquity, Inc.
as 8:2017mc00001
Plaintiff:
Gerald D.W. North
Defendant:
Ubiquity, Inc.
North v. Rosenoff
as 5:2016cv02829
Plaintiff:
Gerald D.W. North
Defendant:
Stephen Rosenoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Talley v. Nevens et al
as 2:2016cv00957
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Nevens
Petitioner:
Maurice Daniel James Talley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
T.P. et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2016cv05298
Plaintiff:
T.P. , D.W. and C.T.
Defendant:
State of Washington , Department of Social and Health Services , Department of Children, Youth and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
