Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Swanson et al v. Piramal Glass-USA Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03220
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Swanson, madison swanson, Joan A. Elmore and others
Defendant:
Jimme Dale Cox, Murray Bros., LLC., Piramal Glass-USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. Caddo Parish Corners Office et al
as 5:2017cv01509
Plaintiff:
Rodricus Crawford
Defendant:
Coroners Office Caddo Parish, Todd G Thoma, James Traylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Lester v. Caddo Parish
as 16-31191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HAYWARD LESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DALE COX, in his individual & official capacity
Cox v. Dugger et al
as 5:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Cox
Defendant:
James Enouch Dugger, Jr. , Maymead, Inc. , Maymead Materials, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00052
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chisolm v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00053
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish and others
Plaintiff:
William Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Musgrove v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ronny Musgrove
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00054
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish, District Attorneys Office Caddo Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duncan v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00051
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Loftin et al
as 5:2015cv02904
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Public Defenders Office Caddo Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
