Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01745
Plaintiff:
Alton D Brown
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Daniel Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Paul Gonzales v. Rio Vista Liquor et al
as 8:2017cv00882
Defendant:
Dany Askar, Askar Brothers, Inc., Daniel Burns Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Paul Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 16-4135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN E. WETZEL, DANIEL BURNS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
MARGARET GORDAN
Johnny Romero v. Daniel Burns, et al
as 16-56516
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY GONZALES ROMERO, also known as Eduardo Arena Garcia
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL BURNS, Superintendent and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
BROWN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, JOHE E. WETZEL, DANIEL BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 16-2497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
In re: Alton D. Brown
as 16-1546
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, DANIEL BURNS, TIMOTHY S. RINGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE and C.O. FRANK
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JAUN R. SANCHEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
