Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Farrell v. Verbero Sports, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01610
Plaintiff:
Daniel Farrell
Defendant:
Verbero Sports, Inc. and Verbero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Thompson v. Poston et al
as 1:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thompson
Defendant:
Brandon Poston, Shelby Dixon, Fernando Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69810
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Farrell v. Boeing Employees Credit Union, et al
as 19-16130
Defendant / Appellee:
BOEING EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION and MOORE BREWER & WOLFE, a Professional Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL FARRELL
Aparicio et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11857
Plaintiff:
Walter Aparicio, Donald Cannon, Vikas Vats and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wahid Shabazz v. R. Rex Parris, et al
as 14-56191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAHID SHABAZZ, AKA Bryron McGee, Sr., AKA Quick
Defendant - Appellee:
R. REX PARRIS, Individual Capacity, WILLIAM PICKETT, Badge No 281470/ Individual Capacity, DANIEL FARRELL, Badge No 466330/ Individual Capacity and others
McCoy v. Hart et al
as 1:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael A McCoy
Defendant:
Charles Hart, Debra Bolen, Rubina Berumen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latisha Clayton v. Daniel Farrell, et al
as 13-57101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LATISHA CLAYTON, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL FARRELL, an individual, ANTHONY DELIA, an individual and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
