Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Terry McDonald v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-50872
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY DANIEL MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
McDonald v. Thaler
as 3:2012cv00092
Petitioner:
Terry Daniel McDonald
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cheatham et al v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Felix Cheatham , Barbara Chestnut , Willie Chestnut and others
Defendant:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheatham et al v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv00563
Plaintiff:
Felix Cheatham , All Plaintiffs , Barbara Chestnut and others
Defendant:
American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of PA, Lexington Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrington et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv08111
Plaintiff:
Victoria Arrington, Victoria Arrington, Victoria Arrington and others
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation, Bechtel Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blakely v. Pilgrim International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Carl Blakely, Sr., Clevin McDonald, Doris Peppers and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim International, Inc., Thor Industries, Inc., Monaco Coach Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
McDonald v. The City of Magee, Mississippi et al
as 3:2007cv00286
Plaintiff:
Daniel McDonald
Defendant:
The City of Magee, Mississippi, The City of Magee Police Department, Ricky Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
