Cases 1 - 10 of 33
COY v. GUY et al
as 3:2020cv15947
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 7, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS STRIKE TASK FORCE, DANIEL MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Daniel Morris v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv50320
Defendant:
Chad Williamson, Michael Ahrens, S. Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. New Mexico Office of Attorney General et al
as 6:2019cv00026
Defendant:
Monica Danielle Morris, New Mexico Office of Attorney General and Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Support Services
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Support Services et al
as 6:2019cv00021
Defendant:
Monica Danielle Morris and Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Support Services
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Texas Office of Attorney General et al
as 6:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Monica Danielle Morris, Peter N. Susca and Texas Office of Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac Jose Rodriguez v. Derrick Carter et al
as 2:2016cv04521
Defendant:
Derrick Carter, City of Pasadena, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jose Rodriguez
Karl Watson v. Kimberly Jones et al
as 2:2013cv05112
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Kimberly Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Watson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LOVE v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2012cv01455
Plaintiff:
JASON A. LOVE
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN PARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAHAM v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , ARTURO VENEGAS , EDWARD HARGIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
