Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Karl Manuel v. Mark Capozza, et al
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK CAPOZZA, C/O SERGEANT WILES, C/O. LT. DAILEY and others
MANUEL v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2020cv01759
Defendant:
ASST SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, C/O SERGENT WILES, C/O LT. DAILEY and others
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PROVITT v. SERGEANT TANNER et al
as 2:2019cv01624
Defendant:
SERGEANT TANNER, NURSE BRENT, Physician Assistant DARLA COWDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PROVITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HEPLER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv00446
Plaintiff:
MICAH HEPLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JAMES BARNACLE, JAY LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIDES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SIDES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, COPAZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
William Mayo v. Michael Oppman, et al
as 17-2803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MAYO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL OPPMAN, DARLA COWDEN and JAY LANE, sued in his official capacity
MAYO v. OPPMAN et al
as 2:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MAYO
Defendant:
MICHAEL OPPMAN, DARLA COWDEN and JAY LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEELS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv00302
Plaintiff:
DESMOND KEELS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JAY LANE, STEVE BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton L . Bullock v. Susan Berrier, et al
as 15-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT C. BULLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN BERRIER, Corrections Healthcare Admin., SCI Fayette, MICHAEL J. HERBIK, Medical Director, SCI Fayette, IRMA VIHIDAH, Corrections HealthCare Admin., SCI Greene and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
