Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Carter Inc., (PS) v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Daryle Bernard Carter, Inc.
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and United States Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carter v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Daryle Bernard Carter
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carter v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Daryle Bernard Carter
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Unknown Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Rivers et al
as 3:2021cv50155
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Christopher Rivers and others
Plaintiff:
Daryle Bernard Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv50018
Respondent:
Christopher Rivers
Petitioner:
Daryle Bernard Carter
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris et al v. USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner et al
as 7:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Julius Lee Thomas, Charlie Harris, RonDell Harris and others
Defendant:
Employees/Staff Officers, Etc., USP Big Sandy Food Services Admin, USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris et al v. USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner et al
as 3:2020cv00321
Plaintiff:
Julius Lee Thomas, Charlie Harris, RonDell Harris and others
Defendant:
Employees/Staff Officers, Etc., USP Big Sandy Food Services Admin, USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Daryl Carter
as 19-7510
Defendant / Appellant:
DARYL BERNARD CARTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carter v. USA
as 5:2016cv00597
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daryl Bernard Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
