Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P. v. Williams Trading LLC, et al.
as 3:2023cv00686
Counter Defendant:
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P. and Dale Mullen
Counter Claimant:
Williams Trading LLC
Defendant:
David Brewster Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
David E Williams v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04424
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David E Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Milburn Colliery Company v. David Williams
as 22-1938
Petitioner:
MILBURN COLLIERY COMPANY
Respondent:
DAVID S. WILLIAMS and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
US v. David Williams
as 21-7125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID FITZGERALD WILLIAMS
Oppenheimer v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv04219
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Ashley River Properties II LLC doing business as Ripley Light Yacht Club, Kriti Ripley LLC, Kelley Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wells v. Williams
as 1:2020cv00351
Defendant:
David V. Williams
Plaintiff:
John H. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S. Shrewsbury v. David Williams
as 20-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WANETA G. MCKINNEY and S. TRAVIS SHREWSBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID F. WILLIAMS
Williams v. USA
as 7:2019cv00211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Fitzgerald Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Warden FCI Estill
as 6:2019cv02845
Petitioner:
David V. Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Awadzi, D.D.S v. The State of Maryland et al
as 1:2019cv01849
Defendant:
Barry L. Cohan, D.D.S, Louis G. Depaola, D.D.S., M.S., Arthur C. Jee, D.M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Awadzi, D.D.S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
