Cases 21 - 30 of 400
Abraham Cruz v. Allegheny County Courthouse, et al
as 22-3055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DIRECTOR, JUDGE DAVID R. CASHMAN and others
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22332
Plaintiff:
DAVID C WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Akinbayo
as 1:2022cv01432
Petitioner:
David M. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Kolawole Akinbayo and Attorney General Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04330
Plaintiff:
DAVID KEITH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, TRANS UNION RENTAL SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC. and RENTSPREE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kelly Christian Brown
Defendant:
David J Williams, Benjamin B Willoughby, Kristy Martinez and others
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Williams v. Michael Martel
as 22-16370
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID EARL WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden
Milburn Colliery Company v. David Williams
as 22-1938
Petitioner:
MILBURN COLLIERY COMPANY
Respondent:
DAVID S. WILLIAMS and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Williams v. USA
as 4:2022cv00711
Petitioner:
David Roy Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13397
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv01796
Plaintiff:
David A. Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and Mr. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
