Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bowens v. McGinley et al
as 2:2021cv02519
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Petitioner:
David Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowens v. McGinley et al
as 3:2021cv00877
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
David Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Apodaca et al v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 1:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Victor Andrew Apodaca and John Does
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, David Jablonski, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00088
Petitioner:
Steven David Bowen
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowen v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv00748
Petitioner:
Scott David Bowen
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Pitt County Government et al
as 5:2012ct03185
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Government, North Carolina State Government, Greenville Municipal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWE v. OFFICER SHOVLIN et al
as 3:2010cv02534
Plaintiff:
Kent Powe
Defendant:
Officer shovlin , F. Royer , David Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bowen v. MDOC, et al
as 10-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BOWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SERGEANT ALLEN and PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden
POWE v. OFFICER SHOVLIN et al
as 2:2010cv00165
Plaintiff:
KENT POWE
Defendant:
OFFICER SHOVLIN, F. BOYER, DAVID BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
POWE v. SHOVLIN et al
as 2:2009cv06141
Plaintiff:
KENT POWE
Defendant:
SHOVLIN, ANNE MYERS, SUSAN FARRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
