Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Philips v. United States District Court for the District of Guam
as 26-4192
Petitioner:
SHERIF ANTOUN PHILIPS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF GUAM
Real Party In Interest:
PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC, MICHAEL BERMAN, DANIEL J. BERMAN and others
Sherif Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.
as 26-1662
Plaintiff:
SHERIF PHILIPS
Defendant:
PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., DAVID CREECH, JAY SALSMAN and others
Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00128
Plaintiff:
Sherif Antoun Philips
Defendant:
Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc., David Creech, Jay Salsman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherif Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital
as 24-1996
Plaintiff:
SHERIF PHILIPS, MD
Defendant:
JAY SALSMAN, PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and DAVID CREECH
Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv00098
Defendant:
Jay Salsman, Pitt County Memorial Hospital and David Creech
Plaintiff:
M.D. Sherif Philips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Creech v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
David Creech
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherif Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc., et al
as 23-16204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERIF A. PHILIPS, M.D.; Dr.
Defendant / Appellee:
PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., PAUL BOLIN, RALPH WHATLEY and others
Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
MD Sherif Philips and Sherif Philips
Defendant:
Jay Salsman, David Creech and Pitt County Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Scott Creech v. Tim Shoop
as 22-3918
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT DAVID CREECH
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Scott Creech v. Ohio Dept of Rehabilitation
as 21-3722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT DAVID CREECH
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
