Cases 11 - 20 of 224
Eleazar Garcia-Gomez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2512
Petitioner:
Eleazar David Garcia-Gomez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Garcia v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Sherry Benton, Clayton Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garcia v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01064
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06700
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARCIA, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
J Smith, . Durbin, Andrew Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
Tara Bennett, David Garcia and Edward Polhill
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Garcia v. Durbin et al
as 1:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
. Durbin and . Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11104
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARCIAS and DAVID GARCIAS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mazariegos et al v. Elite Home and Stone Supply Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Javier Barrios Barrios Mazariegos and Carlos David Garcia Corado
Defendant:
Elite Home and Stone Supply and Mahi Mahesh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
