Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. Bennett et al
as 0:2022cv01742
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David R. Bennett, Alice A. Bennett, Hennepin County, Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Bennett v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
David R. Bennett
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Richard Lubow, et al v. Department of State, et al
as 13-5057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard E. Lubow, Joseph J. Bopp, David R. Bennett and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of State, John F. Kerry, As Secretary of State, acting by and through the Foreign Service Grievance Board, Foreign Service Grievance Board and others
Bennett v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00795
Plaintiff:
David R. Bennett
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Eagle Creek Construction And Development Inc v. Global Green Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv01862
Plaintiff:
Eagle Creek Construction And Development Inc
Defendant:
Global Green Holdings, LLC, Brian Walker and David R Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Private Capital Group, Inc. et al v. BRAL Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01398
Plaintiff:
Private Capital Group, Inc. , NMB Investments, Inc. , Michael Robinson and others
Defendant:
BRAL Holdings, LLC, David R. Bennett and David W. Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUBOW et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2010cv00510
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. LUBOW , JOSEPH J. BOPP , DAVID R. BENNETT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, HILLARY R. CLINTON, FOREIGN SERVICE GRIEVANCE BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
