Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Fuller v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02100
Petitioner:
Ruben Fuller
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Trenkler v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv10780
Petitioner:
Alfred Trenkler
Respondent:
Warden David Rich and Warden Freddie Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simpler v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02071
Petitioner:
Jimmy Edward Simpler
Respondent:
David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02070
Petitioner:
William Brian Mulder
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JSK HOSPITALITY, LLC v. CARNEYS POINT HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04709
Plaintiff:
JSK HOSPITALITY, LLC
Defendant:
Carney's Point Hospitality, LLC, Shailesh Shah, TODD BEAMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dunston v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02009
Petitioner:
Equan Cornelius Dunston
Respondent:
David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Trenkler v. Rich
as 5:2023hc02274
Petitioner:
Alfred Trenkler
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eads v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02031
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Eads
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Rich v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06949
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reeves v. Rich
as 5:2023hc02278
Petitioner:
Gregory Reeves
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
