Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Young v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray Young
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Cevin York, Tommy Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Putnam et al
as 4:2023cv04026
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kenneth Putnam, Amber Ochoa, Marcus Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Whittington et al
as 2:2022cv14247
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Anderson
Defendant:
Dan Whittington, Greg Forless, David Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Ellis
as 2:2021cv02190
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tamera Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrimmon et al v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Defendant:
K. MCCARTER, L. SWANSON, Tamara Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Caron Dettmann and Sarah McCrimmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Leonard David Rodriguez v. Taylor Hart et al
as 5:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Andrew Hacket, Taylor Hart and Joshua Patty
Plaintiff:
Leonard David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. San Antonio Police Department et al
as 5:2018cv00838
Defendant:
David Rodriguez, The City of San Antonio and San Antonio Police Department
Plaintiff:
Clay Arron Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. State Classification Committee
as 1:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
State Classification Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Windham Educational Department
as 6:2016cv01398
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Windham Educational Department and Unknown Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Rodriguez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2016cv02321
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Stan Sniff and William Di Yori
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
