Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Russell et al v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv01209
Petitioner:
John David Russell
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Russell v. USA
as 4:2020cv01082
Plaintiff:
John David Russell
Defendant:
USA, Eric S Higgins, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Posey v. Scott Middlebrooks, et al
as 18-12452
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS, Warden and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
David Russell v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-10595
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RUSSELL
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
POSEY v. MIDDLEBROOKS
as 3:2015cv00452
Petitioner:
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Respondent:
SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Russell v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10799
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RUSSELL
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
David Russell v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10799
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Russell
Respondent / Appellee:
William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Russell v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv00067
Petitioner:
David Russell
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Danner v. Kenneth Cameron, et al
as 13-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RUSSELL DANNER
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMERON, DANIEL J. BARRETT, Esq., ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
David Dumas v. Matthew Cate
as 13-56022
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RUSSELL DUMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE, Secretary of the California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
