Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 363
Walden v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv06061
Plaintiff: Billy Wayne Walden, Sr.
Defendant: Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, David White, Will Brakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Shipley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00713
Plaintiff: Professor David White
Defendant: Attorney Jim Shipley
White v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00213
Petitioner: David White
Respondent: Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David White v. Estella Derr
as 22-15676
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID WHITE
Respondent / Appellee: ESTELLA DERR, Warden
R. White v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70078
Not Classified By Court: In re: R. WHITE, JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, GLEAM DAVIS and others
Petitioner: R. WHITE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Line 2 Line, Inc. v. Race Winning Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00610
Plaintiff: Line 2 Line, Inc.
Defendant: Race Winning Brands, Inc. and David White
White v. Derr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff: David White
Defendant: Estella Derr and Dr. Kwon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. Derr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00127
Petitioner: David White
Respondent: Estella Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
USA v. David White
as 22-10060
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID LEE WHITE, AKA David White
v. NELSON et al
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff: BRETT-ANDREW NELSON
Defendant: DONALD CORWIN JACKSON, LORI BETH TALBOT, ASHKEY MORGAN BURGEMEISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?