Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Davis-Standard, LLC v. Teich et al
as 3:2013cv01792
Plaintiff:
Davis-Standard, LLC
Defendant:
Donald Teich and Sam North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DS Parent, Inc. v. Teich et al
as 5:2013cv01489
Plaintiff:
DS Parent, Inc. and Davis-Standard, LLC
Defendant:
Donald Teich and Sam North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHEN et al v. HANGZHOU HOLIN PLASTIC MACHINERY CO., LTD et al
as 5:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
BOA TING CHEN and SHEN YUN PAN
Defendant:
HANGZHOU HOLIN PLASTIC MACHINERY CO., LTD, UPG FORT JAMES INVESTMENT LP, UPG REALTY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis-Standard, LLC v. Big Vision Pvt. Ltd.
as 5:2009cv01160
Plaintiff:
Davis-Standard, LLC
Defendant:
Big Vision Pvt. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Netstal-Maschinen AG v. Davis-Standard LLC
as 1:2009cv00344
Plaintiff:
Netstal-Maschinen AG
Defendant:
Davis-Standard LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Osprey Corporation v. Davis-Standard, LLC
as 1:2007cv01925
Plaintiff:
Osprey Corporation
Defendant:
Davis-Standard, LLC and Davis-Standard, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Davis-Standard, LLC and Davis-Standard, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Osprey Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Nguyen et al v. Davis-Standard LLC et al
as 5:2007cv00257
Plaintiff:
Bich Nguyen and Thuong Nguyen
Defendant:
Davis-Standard LLC, Davis-Standard LLC, Beringer LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lamson & Sessions, Inc v. Davis Standard, LLC
as 3:2007cv00192
Plaintiff:
Lamson & Sessions, Inc and Lamson & Sessions, Inc
Defendant:
Davis Standard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
