Cases 1 - 10 of 11,064
Roundtree v. Lamont
as 24-1319
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess ANJAKNIE ROUNDTREE, -Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglass, ELIZABETH QUEEN, ANDREW, King and others
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, State of Connecticut's Governor, JEN ZAROZI, State Capitol Police, DEVIN, Officer and others
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAVON DAVIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Davis v. Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL)
as 5:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Gavin B. Davis
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL) doing business as ViaPath Technologies (ViaPath)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Almeida v. Taxiarchos et al
as 1:2024cv10704
Plaintiff:
Ana Almeida
Defendant:
John Taxiarchos, Rose Renee Fernandes, City of New Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Davies v. The Bank of Missouri
as 8:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Kelli Davies
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Grant Davis, Jr.
as 24-11511
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GRANT ELMORE DAVIS, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PARENTEAU et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
EDMOND GEORGE PARENTEAU, WILLIAM HERCULES DAVIS, JR., REVETTE MARCELLA HARVEY and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Goodman (Evans)
as 24-1258
Defendant:
WILLIE EVANS, JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
