Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Dawkins v. Thompson et al
as 5:2024ct03123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Lamar Dawkins
Defendant:
Captain Tanesha Thompson, Captain Powell Wendell, Sergeant Dunia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
AMERICA WASHINGTON, ANGELA ADAMS, BASHAWN LAWRENCE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
DAWKINS v. STALEY et al
as 1:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL DAWKINS
Defendant:
TWANDA STALEY and DSS AND CPS AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dawkins v. Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLC
as 1:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
FORSYTH COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT UNIT v. DAWKINS
as 1:2018cv00190
Defendant:
MICHAEL DAWKINS
Plaintiff:
FORSYTH COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Joyner et al
as 5:2017ct03044
Plaintiff:
Brice C. Moore
Defendant:
Carlton Joyner, S.B. Waddell, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAWKINS v. MALVICH
as 1:2016cv01320
Plaintiff:
BRENDA LEE DAWKINS
Defendant:
JAKE MALVICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins v. Perry
as 5:2016hc02015
Petitioner:
Bakeer Deshawn Dawkins
Respondent:
Frank L. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dawkins v. Perry
as 5:2015hc02276
Petitioner:
Bakeer Deshawn Dawkins
Respondent:
Frank L. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
