Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Daw v. United States of America
as 3:2026cv01893
Plaintiff:
Seth Daw
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cooley v. City of Barre et al
as 2:2026cv00221
Plaintiff:
Gary Cooley
Defendant:
City of Barre, Carolyn Dawes and Zachary Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Roman et al v. Dude Products, LLC
as 5:2026cv06023
Plaintiff:
Rena Roman and Bryan Dawe
Defendant:
Dude Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adams et al v. Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
as 6:2026cv00376
Plaintiff:
Darlene Adams, Tammy Lea Anderson-Taylor, Gary Beaty and others
Defendant:
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dawes v. Johnson et al
as 1:2026cv04345
Plaintiff:
Ian Dawes
Defendant:
Jacob L. Johnson, David M. Hoovler, Alexis Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monychop Daw v. Todd Blanche
as 26-1618
Petitioner:
MONYCHOP TOR DAW, a/k/a Monychop Toi Daw, a/k/a Daw Monychop Tor
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03209
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Landry et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 3:2026cv00497
Plaintiff:
William Landry and Stephanie Dawes
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Daw v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2026cv01243
Plaintiff:
Seth Daw
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
