Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Chaney et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Defendant:
Holly Harris, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dawson v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc.
as 5:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Jennifer S. Dawson
Respondent:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc.
Wilson v. Mafnas et al
as 6:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Lorenzoe Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt Edward Mafnas, Sean Davis, Dawson Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Mafnas et al
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Lorenzoe Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt Edward Mafnas, Capt Sean Davis, Dawson Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summit Locations, LLC et al v. City of Dawson Springs, Kentucky et al
as 4:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Summit Locations, LLC and Huntington Outdoor, LLC doing business as Huntington Billboards
Defendant:
City of Dawson Springs, Kentucky and Amie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dawson v. Mock
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dawson
Defendant:
Delsa Mock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dawson v. Mock
as 0:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dawson
Defendant:
Delsa Mock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dawson v. Mock
as 0:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dawson
Defendant:
Delsa Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Unum Life Insurance Company Of America
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Pamela Dawson
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dawson v. Meijer, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Dawson
Defendant:
Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
